Tyumen Oil Worker Demands 460,000 Rubles for Delayed Salary

Top manager of an oil company Vladimir Sh. demanded over 400,000 rubles (about $4,400 at current rates) from his former employer for delayed salary. According to the oil worker, after his dismissal the company violated the payment deadlines. Here«s what the court decided after several years of disputes between the parties.

Long dispute over salary and dismissal

Vladimir Sh. worked as the executive director of an oil company. In September 2022, he resigned by mutual agreement, but, as he claimed in court, the company did not pay him the salary due.

Then Vladimir filed a lawsuit to recover a multi-million salary debt, compensation, and interest. In February 2024, the company paid the main amount of the debt — about 1.7 million rubles (about $18,700 at current rates). Then Vladimir specified his demands: he insisted on payment of interest for the delay in payments and compensation for legal expenses.

The parties« positions in court

Employee«s demands

Vladimir and his representative insisted that the company violated the deadlines for final settlement upon dismissal, and therefore the employer must pay interest for the delay. They also demanded reimbursement of the costs of legal representation in court — a total of just over 464,000 rubles (about $5,100 at current rates).

Company«s position

The representative of the oil company stated that the company had no debt to the plaintiff, as he did not actually perform his job duties during the disputed period — from September 2021 to September 2022. The company provided evidence that during this time Vladimir was already the general director of another oil company located in a different region.

The company noted that the employment contract with Vladimir did not provide for remote work. The company also provided payment orders confirming payments to Vladimir during the disputed period totaling 1.36 million rubles (about $15,000 at current rates).

What did the court decide?

First instance decision

The Tyumen Central District Court sided with the worker, ordering the company to pay over 464,000 rubles (about $5,100 at current rates). Disagreeing with this, the employer filed an appeal.

What the appellate court decided

Having studied the case materials, the appellate panel made several key conclusions that radically changed the outcome of the dispute.

The court«s decision was based on three key facts. First, the plaintiff did not prove that he worked during the disputed period: Vladimir did not provide confirmation of performing duties at the company, and in the court hearing he himself explained that at that time he held the position of general director at another organization. Moreover, his employment contract with the defendant was never amended to switch to remote work.

Second, this led to the conclusion that there was no debt. Since the performance of job functions was not confirmed, the company had no obligation to pay wages, and consequently, no grounds for charging interest for their delay.

Finally, the court took into account that the settlement with the employee had actually been made. The payment documents presented by the company totaling 1.36 million rubles (about $15,000 at current rates) were regarded as proof of full and timely fulfillment of financial obligations to Vladimir.

«The judicial panel believes that the plaintiff did not prove that he performed his job duties during the disputed period, and therefore the employer has no obligation to pay the plaintiff wages or interest for delayed wage payment,» the decision stated.

As a result, the appellate court overturned the district court«s decision to recover 404,000 rubles (about $4,400 at current rates) in interest and 60,000 rubles (about $660 at current rates) in legal costs. And it issued a new decision — to deny Vladimir these claims in full.

If you like unusual court disputes and decisions, check out our other articles in the section «Who is right?».

Scammers took out a loan in a woman«s name. The bank demanded payment, but she refused.

A Tyumen oil worker was credited with 7 million rubles (about $77,000 at current rates) in salary due to an error. The company demanded the money back, but the man refused;

A girl slipped on a bridge in Tyumen and became disabled. Her mother demanded 2 million rubles (about $22,000 at current rates) from the authorities, but officials shifted responsibility onto the child«s family;

A mother of a schoolgirl from the Tyumen region swore at a teacher. The teacher demanded 200,000 rubles (about $2,200 at current rates);

A woman sold land and a house to her former lover, then accused him of tyranny and demanded the deal be canceled.