Education vs Diploma: Rostovites Debate Universities

Rostov graduates criticized universities, and readers in comments split into two camps: some consider the diploma useless, others — an important stage of development.
Jul 30, 2026
0
Some Rostov graduates believe that higher education does not benefit their careers.
Source:
Alexander Oshchepkov / NGS.RU
Earlier, several graduates of Rostov universities — a programmer, a journalist, and a lawyer — said they were disappointed with higher education. They pointed to outdated programs and a lack of practical benefit.
A typical lecture hall at a Rostov university, where students share their views.
Source:

161.RU

The publication sparked a lively discussion: some readers agreed, while others defended the universities. Here are some of the comments.
A discussion among Rostov residents debates the true worth of a university education.
Source:

161.RU

«In the 1990s and now, simply put, some people got an education, and others got a diploma. They are different things. Earlier, production modernization was rapid, and much attention was given to rationalization to increase productivity. Young specialists with higher and secondary technical education found their calling in this. And the state incentivized them with apartments and bonuses. People were truly proud of their work results, not how much they could »make a quick buck.«»
«The task of a university is to teach how to think, analyze tasks, break them down, and find the necessary information, and this is regardless of »modern« technologies. Technologies change every quarter, and even with the best will, the university cannot keep up with updating training programs.»
«Well, what»s there to be surprised about? The desire to teach and learn is killed in school — the Unified State Exam alone is enough. This is not studying, it«s training. What knowledge?»
«In universities, there is simply an inhuman gap between the salaries of administrative staff (like HR) and teachers, those who teach students. And judging by the salaries, teachers are the least needed by universities.»
«All this is true, unfortunately. The worst part is that doctors are trained the same way.»
«Those who have worked in their field are not always suitable for teaching. Both rarely coincide in one person. The university teaches how to think, find necessary information, analyze it, and cannot always keep up with life. One must give a specialist fundamental skills and lay the foundations of broad thinking, the ability to develop and upgrade qualifications. Then you move your knowledge and skills forward in work yourself. No one will spoon-feed you. That»s why some young specialists cannot be allowed to work independently until after three years.«
Read more